@morushroom Writers and artists alike have suffered a big blow since AI came to fruition. AI generated text or art should meet minimal support from the general public, and give their most to real authors who actually put effort with what they bring to this world. AI cannot feel sentiment with what they create, except for humans.
Also sorry for not seeing your posts, but even still, they don't look generated from a computer.
You're right, only humans can inspire and be inspired, either it be by their own creativity or creativity of the others.
Also no worries, and thanks for your opinion on my stuff!
There are several...the most common one being the eye-drop test.
Y´see with AI they dont know how to properly use colours so if you use the eye drop on AI pics you will see a vast amount of colours being used if you even slightly move the tool around even tho the eye drop is on a thing coloured red or white.
Another is that AI can only COPY existing art-styles its been fed with SO all of it is is just a mashup of the materials its got.
It CANNOT innovate and so for the most part they all look like glossy cartoonish figures or one of those paintings from the Romantic era.They all give off a feeling in your gut whenever you look at them that just tells you something about it is off.
Also AI cannot into precise or complex details and anatomy so that´s why the background objects or fingers or something in far distance looks like its melted.It can only employ the photographers rule of the thirds where the thing it wants you to notice is in the oval/circle central area of the shot while everything else in the picture is given less effort and therefore has the telltale marks of a shopped or AI made painting.You look at the robo-scribbles while keeping this in mind, you will know what im talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MUEXGaxFDA 30:00
https://mksc746.newgrounds.com/news/post/1414736
Take a gander at these two links if you want some more reassurance.Spread it around, to your friends.
No matter how much the Algae-rhytm develops, people will always prefer man-made goods over industrialised pre-fabs.Why do you think old stuff like furniture and the like is so sought-after and pricy over the arguably better modern ones?
I mean with illustrations you can do stuff like post an occasional speedpaint or post commissions you've received, maybe even take snapshots of ink sketches. Create a paper trail that shows you evolving organically as you practice your art. Network yourself and demonstrate that you are a living, breathing person and not someone typing into a GPT prompt. The more established you become, the less likely you are to be written off as a possible AI fraudster.
Also, chatGPT has a very specific, utilitarian style of spelling and grammar which I'm not seeing here. So you should be good tbh
goncalves2341
I just looked at your art, and I can say that, no, they don't look like AI generated. It's a mutual fear that artists have with AI, due to it's rapid progression. It seems AI will play a major focus throughout this year, and it is scary how there won't be a stopping to it anytime soon.
I would LOVE if there is a way to identify AI generated images more easily. But because it's in it's infancy, there are ways to know if it is, by just looking carefully for any anomalies.
morushroom
I truly appreciate your feedback on my art, and your insight is pretty in-depth. But what I've meant are my blog posts, and to be honest – you've answered it without any straightforward claims.
I've been worrying that my posts are too long to be trustworthy about being written by a real person, but I guess there are enough people on this website who share the same mindset and habit to provide people with more than a lot of information, so I don't stick out much, really.
I think AI revolution is a pretty dangerous thing for people, who don't want their diligent contribution to be underappreciated, be it art or text.